Macro-Fiscal Context: The Decoupling of Asset and Labor Taxation

The Autumn Budget 2025, delivered by Chancellor Rachel Reeves, marks a definitive structural pivot in the fiscal treatment of residential property in the United Kingdom. To fully comprehend the specific measures targeting landlords—ranging from the introduction of a dedicated Property Income Tax surcharge to the crystallization of the Renters’ Rights Act timeline—it is essential to first analyze the macroeconomic architecture that necessitated these interventions. The Budget was framed against a backdrop of a reported £22 billion “fiscal black hole” and a strategic imperative to stabilize public finances without alienating the bond markets, a spectre that has haunted Treasury policy since the volatility of recent years.1

The Chancellor’s central economic thesis rests on a bifurcation of the tax base: protecting the “working person” (defined primarily through the lens of earned income) while shifting the revenue burden onto “passive” wealth and asset accumulation. This is not merely a political rhetorical device but a legislative reality evidenced by the introduction of differential tax rates for property income versus labor income. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) confirms that these measures are designed to raise substantial revenue—£26 billion in total tax rises—while attempting to double the “fiscal headroom” to ensure resilience against future economic shocks.3

For the property investor, this signals the end of the “parity era” where rental income was treated broadly similarly to other forms of income, subject to the same bands and allowances (notwithstanding the Section 24 mortgage interest restrictions introduced in 2015). The 2025 Budget establishes a precedent that residential property is a distinct, targetable asset class capable of bearing specific levies that do not apply to the wider economy. The narrative is clear: the government views the private rented sector (PRS) not as a partner in housing delivery, but as a reservoir of accumulated wealth that can be tapped to subsidize broader public service remediation and infrastructure investment.5

This report provides an exhaustive analysis of these measures, contrasting the realized policies against the pre-budget speculation typified by industry commentators such as Holland Asset Management. It explores the operational realities of the new “High Value Council Tax Surcharge,” the erosion of corporate tax efficiency, and the regulatory cliff-edge presented by the accelerated implementation of the Renters’ Rights Act.

Comparative Analysis: Pre-Budget Speculation vs. Fiscal Reality

In the months preceding the Autumn Statement, the property sector was rife with speculation. Investment consultancies and asset managers, including Holland Asset Management, prepared clients for what was expected to be a draconian assault on property wealth. A critical examination of these predictions versus the enacted legislation reveals that while the specific mechanisms differed, the financial impact is broadly aligned with the sector’s worst fears, albeit delivered through more complex structural changes rather than blunt rate hikes.

The following analysis benchmarks the actual Autumn Budget 2025 announcements against the “Holland Asset Management” consensus view and wider market predictions.

The “National Insurance on Rent” Prediction

Prediction: Industry analysis, including commentary associated with Holland Asset Management, strongly indicated the potential introduction of a National Insurance-style levy on rental income. Speculation suggested a rate of roughly 8% to 12%, aimed at closing the gap between the taxation of earned income and rental profit.7

Autumn Budget 2025 Reality: The Chancellor did not introduce “National Insurance” on rent per se, likely due to the legislative complexity of reclassifying rent as “earnings” for social security purposes. Instead, the Budget introduced a specific “Property Income Tax Surcharge” of 2% across all bands.8

Strategic Implication: While a 2% surcharge is numerically lower than a hypothetical 8% NI levy, the structural implication is equally profound. By creating a distinct tax rate for property income (22%, 42%, 47%), the Treasury has created a mechanism that can be raised independently of Income Tax in future budgets. The “firewall” protecting landlords—the political difficulty of raising Income Tax on workers—has been removed for property investors. The prediction was directionally correct in anticipating a decoupling of labor and property taxation, even if the initial rate is lower than feared.

Capital Gains Tax (CGT) Alignment

Prediction: There was widespread consensus that CGT rates for residential property would be aligned with Income Tax rates (potentially rising to 39% or 45%), effectively ending the incentive for capital appreciation strategies.3

Autumn Budget 2025 Reality: The rates for residential property were maintained at 18% (basic) and 24% (higher).9 While reliefs for business assets (BADR) were tightened, the residential sector avoided the “cliff-edge” rate hike.

Strategic Implication: This represents the single significant “win” for the sector relative to expectations. The Treasury likely calculated that quadrupling the tax rate would freeze transaction volumes, thereby reducing the total yield from CGT and Stamp Duty. However, the retention of the current rates suggests the government is prioritizing market liquidity over punitive taxation on exit, at least for the current parliamentary term.

The “Wealth Tax” vs. “Mansion Tax”

Prediction: Speculation focused on a broad “Wealth Tax” or a reform of Council Tax bands to target high-value assets. Holland Asset Management and others discussed the possibility of an annual levy on property value.7

Autumn Budget 2025 Reality: The Budget confirmed a “High Value Council Tax Surcharge” (HVCTS) targeting properties valued over £2 million. This acts effectively as a Mansion Tax, levied annually on top of existing Council Tax liabilities.12

Strategic Implication: The prediction was accurate. The government chose to use the existing Council Tax collection infrastructure rather than creating a new “Wealth Tax” bureaucracy. This pragmatic approach ensures immediate revenue generation (forecast at £400m by 2029-30) but places a heavy burden on Prime Central London (PCL) and the South East, decoupling the tax from the occupier’s ability to pay and attaching it strictly to the asset’s value.

Table 1: Divergence Analysis – Holland Asset Management Predictions vs. Budget 2025

Area of Policy

Predicted Outcome (Holland Asset Management / Market Consensus)

Actual Autumn Budget 2025 Mechanism

Strategic Deviation Analysis

Rental Taxation

Introduction of ~8% National Insurance levy on rental profits.

2% Property Income Tax Surcharge. Rates set at 22%, 42%, 47%. 8

The government opted for a “surcharge” to avoid the complexity of the NI system, but the effect is the same: higher effective tax on rent than work.

Capital Gains

Alignment with Income Tax (up to 45%).

No Change. Rates held at 18% / 24% for residential property. 9

A concession to liquidity. Preventing a market freeze was prioritized over ideology.

Property Wealth

Annual “Mansion Tax” or Council Tax revaluation.

High Value Council Tax Surcharge. Flat fees (£2.5k / £7.5k) for properties >£2m. 12

Confirmed. A tiered, value-based levy that avoids a full revaluation of the entire housing stock.

Stamp Duty

Structural overhaul or lower thresholds.

Surcharge Increase. The surcharge for additional homes remains elevated at 5%. 14

The “entry tax” remains high, discouraging speculative flipping and “accidental” landlordism.

Holiday Lets

Tightening of rules.

Total Abolition. FHL regime scrapped; treated as standard ASTs. 16

Much harsher than predicted. The complete removal of the regime forces a binary choice: sell or switch to long-term let.

Structural Reform 1: The Property Income Tax Surcharge

The introduction of the Property Income Tax Surcharge is arguably the most significant long-term structural change in the Budget. By legislating for specific tax rates that apply only to income from property (and savings/dividends), the Chancellor has fundamentally altered the investment landscape.5

The “Fairness” Narrative and Economic Reality

The Chancellor justified the 2% surcharge by citing the disparity between a landlord earning £25,000 in rent and a worker earning £25,000 in wages, noting that the latter pays National Insurance while the former does not.6 This “fairness” narrative serves to politically insulate the move, framing landlords as beneficiaries of a tax loophole.

However, economically, this analysis ignores the risk profile of property investment (voids, repairs, arrears) compared to employment. The surcharge effectively acts as a “Shadow National Insurance,” recouping a portion of the revenue the Treasury feels it loses due to the non-employment status of landlords.

Financial Impact Modeling

The 2% increase applies to the Basic, Higher, and Additional rates, taking them to 22%, 42%, and 47% respectively from April 2027.6 While a 2% rise appears marginal, it interacts toxically with the existing Section 24 restriction on mortgage interest relief.

Scenario: Consider a Higher Rate taxpayer with a portfolio generating £50,000 gross rent and £20,000 mortgage interest costs.

  • Pre-Budget Position: The taxpayer pays 40% on the £50,000 (minus non-finance costs), then receives a 20% credit on the mortgage interest.
  • Post-Budget Position (2027): The taxpayer pays 42% on the gross profit. The tax credit on mortgage interest remains capped at 20%.
  • The “spread” between the tax rate (42%) and the relief credit (20%) widens to 22 percentage points.
  • This exacerbates the effective tax rate on real profit. For highly leveraged landlords, the effective tax rate on cash flow can easily exceed 100%, forcing them to subsidize the portfolio from other income.

Long-Term Strategic Risk

The creation of the “Property Income Tax” band is a one-way ratchet. History suggests that once a specific tax head is created (e.g., Insurance Premium Tax, Air Passenger Duty), rates rarely decrease. Future governments facing fiscal pressure will find it politically expedient to raise the “Landlord Tax” (Property Rate) rather than the “Worker Tax” (Income Tax). Investors must now price in a persistent and potentially widening divergent tax rate for rental income.

Structural Reform 2: The High Value Council Tax Surcharge (“Mansion Tax”)

The Autumn Budget 2025 confirms the introduction of a High Value Council Tax Surcharge (HVCTS) from April 2028, targeting residential properties in England valued over £2 million.12 This measure, estimated to raise £400 million by 2029-30, represents a shift towards taxing unrealized capital wealth.

Valuation and the Cliff Edge

The surcharge is structured in bands:

  • Properties £2m – £5m: £2,500 per annum surcharge.
  • Properties >£5m: £7,500 per annum surcharge.

Critically, valuations will be based on open market values as of 2026.18 This introduces a massive distortion in the property market for homes currently valued between £1.8 million and £2.2 million.

  • The “Dead Zone”: Sellers of properties worth roughly £2.05 million will be forced to accept offers under £2 million, as buyers will refuse to cross the threshold that triggers the £2,500 annual liability. This creates a hard price ceiling.
  • Valuation Office Agency (VOA) Disputes: The VOA will be tasked with revaluing high-end stock. Given that Council Tax bands are currently based on 1991 values, this partial revaluation is administratively complex. We anticipate a significant volume of litigation and appeals in 2027 as owners attempt to suppress valuations below the £2m threshold.

Impact on Prime Yields

For the Build-to-Rent (BtR) sector and investors in Prime Central London (PCL), this surcharge is a direct hit to net operating income (NOI).

  • On a £2.5 million flat yielding 3% (£75,000/year), a £2,500 surcharge represents a 3.3% erosion of gross income.
  • Unlike Stamp Duty (a transactional tax), this is a holding tax. It increases the “burn rate” of holding vacant high-value stock, potentially incentivizing faster sales or lettings, but fundamentally reducing the asset’s investment appeal compared to global alternatives.

The Abolition of Furnished Holiday Lettings (FHL)

The Autumn Budget 2025 confirmed the complete abolition of the Furnished Holiday Lettings (FHL) tax regime, effective April 2025 for Income Tax and April 2026 for Corporation Tax.9 This measure is designed to address housing shortages in coastal and rural communities by removing the tax incentives that favored short-term letting over long-term residential provision.

The Loss of the “Tax Haven”

The FHL regime provided four critical advantages that are now lost:

  1. Full Mortgage Interest Relief: FHLs could deduct 100% of finance costs. From April 2025, they will be restricted to the basic rate tax credit (20%), aligning with standard buy-to-let.
  2. Capital Allowances: FHLs could claim allowances on furniture and fixtures. This is replaced by “Replacement of Domestic Items Relief,” which only covers the replacement of items, not the initial fit-out.16
  3. Pensionable Earnings: FHL profits counted as relevant earnings for pension contributions. This status is revoked.
  4. Business Asset Disposal Relief (BADR): FHL exits qualified for a 10% CGT rate. They will now attract the standard residential rates of 18% or 24%.17

Economic Fallout for Coastal Investors

The removal of full mortgage interest relief is the most damaging element. For investors who bought holiday cottages in Cornwall or the Lake District at peak prices using mortgages, the math often relied on deducting that interest.

  • Example: A holiday let generating £30,000 rent with £15,000 interest costs.
  • Old Rules: Taxable profit = £15,000.
  • New Rules: Taxable profit = £30,000. Tax is calculated on £30,000, and a £3,000 credit (20% of £15k) is deducted. For a 42% taxpayer, the tax bill rises significantly, potentially turning a profit into a cash-flow loss.

This policy forces a binary choice: sell the asset (likely triggering a wave of supply in holiday hotspots, depressing prices) or convert it to a standard Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST), where yields are typically lower but demand is more stable.

Regulatory Shock: The Renters’ Rights Act and Court Reform

While the tax measures garner the headlines, the regulatory changes confirmed in the Autumn Budget 2025 are equally transformative. The Chancellor confirmed funding and timelines for the implementation of the Renters’ Rights Act (RRA), effectively setting a countdown clock for the sector.

The Big Bang Implementation: May 1, 2026

The government has discarded the idea of a phased introduction. Instead, the RRA will come into force on May 1, 2026, for all tenancies, new and existing.19

  • Section 21 Abolition: From this date, “no-fault” evictions are banned.
  • Tenancy Structure: All fixed-term tenancies convert to periodic (rolling) tenancies. Tenants can give two months’ notice to leave at any time, while landlords can only evict on specific legal grounds (Section 8).
  • Rent Controls (Soft): Rent increases will be limited to once per year, and tenants can challenge “above market” increases at a First-tier Tribunal.

The “Enforcement Budget” and Court Digitization

A major criticism of abolishing Section 21 has been the incapacity of the County Courts to handle the increased volume of Section 8 hearings (which, unlike Section 21, require a court hearing and evidence). The Budget allocates specific funding to the Ministry of Justice and HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) to digitize the possession claim process and recruit additional judiciary staff.21

  • The Funding Gap: While the Budget promises efficiency, the timeline is tight. If the courts are not fully digitized by May 2026, the backlog of possession cases—already sitting at 6-12 months in some regions—could balloon.
  • Strategic Risk: Landlords face a “liquidity trap” where they cannot easily regain possession of their asset. This risk premium will likely be priced into rents, driving them higher.

The Spring 2026 “Eviction Spike”

The timeline creates a perverse incentive. Landlords who are risk-averse or wish to sell their properties before the new rules lock them in will likely serve Section 21 notices in Q1 2026. This effectively creates a deadline for portfolio rationalization. We anticipate a significant spike in eviction notices and property listings in early 2026 as “accidental” and risk-averse landlords exit the market before the door closes.

Corporate Taxation: The Erosion of the “Limited Company” Shelter

For the past decade, incorporation (holding property in a Limited Company/SPV) has been the standard advice for tax mitigation. The Budget 2025 begins to erode, though not destroy, this advantage.

Reduction in Writing Down Allowances (WDA)

The Autumn Budget 2025 reduces the main rate of Writing Down Allowances for Corporation Tax from 18% to 14%, effective April 2026.8

  • Mechanism: When a company buys plant and machinery (e.g., lifts, communal heating, furniture packages for HMOs), it cannot deduct the full cost immediately (unless it qualifies for the Annual Investment Allowance, which is capped). Instead, it deducts a percentage of the value each year.
  • Impact: reducing the rate to 14% slows down the rate of tax relief. It means companies pay more Corporation Tax in the early years of an investment.
  • Context: While “Full Expensing” allows trading businesses to deduct 100% of capital costs, this typically does not apply to assets leased out for residential use. Therefore, property companies rely on WDAs. This cut is a “stealth tax” on capital-intensive property developers and HMO operators.

The Dividend Tax Hike

The Autumn Budget 2025 also increased the tax rates on dividend income by 2 percentage points, to 10.75% (Basic), 35.75% (Higher), and 39.35% (Additional).11

  • The Double Taxation Effect: A portfolio landlord holding properties in a company pays Corporation Tax on the profit (up to 25%), and then pays the increased Dividend Tax when extracting the cash.
  • Calculation:
  • Profit: £100,000.
  • Corp Tax (25%): £25,000.
  • Distributable: £75,000.
  • Dividend Tax (Higher Rate 35.75%): ~£26,800.
  • Total Tax: ~£51,800 (Effective Rate ~52%).
  • Despite this, the corporate structure remains superior to personal ownership for higher-rate taxpayers because mortgage interest remains 100% deductible for companies. The “Limited Company Shelter” is leaking, but it is still the only boat that floats.

Green Incentives: The Warm Homes Plan

Amidst the tax hikes, the Budget offers one significant area of fiscal support: energy efficiency grants under the “Warm Homes Plan.” This is a strategic opportunity for landlords to upgrade stock at the government’s expense.

The Warm Homes Local Grant

The Autumn Budget 2025 allocates £500 million to this scheme, starting delivery in 2025.25 The grant targets the private rented sector specifically, acknowledging that rental stock is often the least energy-efficient.

  • Eligibility:
  • Properties with EPC ratings of D, E, F, or G.
  • Tenants must be low-income (gross household income <£36,000) or the property must be in an eligible postcode (Index of Multiple Deprivation areas).26
  • Funding Levels:
  • First Property: Up to £30,000 fully funded (no landlord contribution required).
  • Subsequent Properties: Up to £15,000, with a requirement for the landlord to contribute 50% of the cost.28
  • Eligible Measures: Insulation (wall, loft), low-carbon heating (heat pumps), and solar panels.

Strategic ROI

For landlords with eligible portfolios (e.g., student housing in lower-income areas, or legacy housing stock in the North/Midlands), this is a massive ROI opportunity.

  • Capital Uplift: Moving a property from EPC E to C increases its capital value and marketability.
  • Future Proofing: The government remains committed to Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) of EPC C by 2030.29 Utilizing these grants now prevents a forced CapEx spend in 2029.
  • Tenant Stability: Lower energy bills for tenants reduce the risk of rental arrears during cost-of-living crises.

Strategic Scenarios and Portfolio Analysis

To synthesize the impact of these disparate measures, we analyze three distinct investor profiles to determine the net strategic effect of the Budget 2025.

Profile A: The “Accidental” Landlord

  • Profile: Higher-rate taxpayer, owns 1-2 properties personally (e.g., inherited or former home), standard ASTs.
  • Budget Impact: Severe. The 2% Property Income Tax surcharge, combined with Section 24, erodes net profit. The increased Stamp Duty surcharge (5%) makes expanding unviable. The Renters’ Rights Act (May 2026) introduces compliance risks they are ill-equipped to manage.
  • Verdict: Exit. The complexity and tax burden now outweigh the passive returns. We expect this demographic to sell heavily in 2026.

Profile B: The Professional Portfolio Landlord (Personal Name)

  • Profile: 5-10 properties, held personally, highly leveraged.
  • Budget Impact: Critical. The 2% surcharge interacts with high leverage to push effective tax rates dangerously high. The HVCTS (“Mansion Tax”) may hit their own home or high-value rental units.
  • Verdict: Restructure. Immediate need to stop acquiring personally. Consideration of “beneficial interest company trusts” or other incorporation strategies (despite SDLT/CGT friction) to move income into a corporate wrapper. Focus on utilizing Warm Homes Grants to improve asset value before potential divestment of low-yielding units.

Profile C: The Corporate Investor / Developer

  • Profile: Trading via SPVs, focus on HMOs or Blocks.
  • Budget Impact: Manageable Friction. The WDA cut (18% to 14%) and Dividend Tax rise reduce efficiency, but the core model remains viable due to interest deductibility. The SDLT surcharge is a cost of doing business. The Renters’ Rights Act is a procedural challenge, not an existential one.
  • Verdict: Consolidate. This group is best placed to acquire stock dumped by Profile A and B. The “High Value Council Tax Surcharge” discourages PCL investment, so strategy should pivot to high-yield regional markets (North East/North West) where property values are well below £2m and yields are higher.

And Finally…

The Autumn Budget 2025 represents the final phase of the “professionalization” of the UK Private Rented Sector. By decoupling property taxation from general income taxation, the government has created a distinct fiscal silo for landlords, one that is easier to target for future revenue raising. The combination of the Property Income Tax Surcharge, the abolition of the FHL regime, and the imminent Renters’ Rights Act creates a “hostile environment” for the amateur, leveraged investor.

However, for the professional corporate investor, the landscape remains navigable. The retention of CGT rates and the specific targeting of personal income suggests that the government is not trying to kill the rental market, but rather to force it into a corporate, regulated structure. The opportunity lies in the coming volatility: the period between now and May 2026 will likely see significant distressed selling. For those with capital and corporate structures, the “Autumn Budget 2025 Correction” may prove to be a buying opportunity, provided they steer clear of the £2m+ “Mansion Tax” trap and leverage the available green infrastructure grants.

The era of the “passive” landlord is legislatively over; the era of the active, tax-efficient real estate operator has begun.


References

  1. Autumn Budget 2025 summary: What you need to know | 26 Nov 2025 | Insights, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.bishopfleming.co.uk/insights/autumn-budget-2025-summary-what-you-need-know
  2. Rachel Reeves’s high-stakes autumn budget 2025 in five key charts, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/nov/26/five-key-charts-2025-budget-statement-rachel-reeves
  3. Autumn Budget 2025: initial response | Institute for Fiscal Studies – IFS, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://ifs.org.uk/articles/autumn-budget-2025-initial-response
  4. Rachel Reeves says budget will cut living costs after shock OBR leak, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/nov/26/rachel-reeves-poised-to-unveil-tax-rises-worth-26bn-in-budget-figures-reveal
  5. Budget 2025 (HTML) – GOV.UK, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/budget-2025-document/budget-2025-html
  6. BUDGET: Chancellor reveals mansion tax and higher landlord income tax, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://thenegotiator.co.uk/news/uk-housing-market-news/chancellor-reveals-autumn-budget-to-apprehensive-property-industry/
  7. What “Could Be” in the Autumn Budget 2025 for Landlords and Property Owners – and How to Prepare? – Black and White Accounting, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://blackandwhiteaccounting.co.uk/what-could-be-in-the-2025-budget-for-landlords-and-property-owners-and-how-to-prepare/
  8. Autumn Budget 2025 – headlines for the property sector, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.propertymark.co.uk/resource/autumn-budget-2025-headlines-for-the-property-sector.html
  9. Tax changes for furnished holiday lets – BDO, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.bdo.co.uk/en-gb/insights/tax/private-client/tax-changes-for-furnished-holiday-lets
  10. Furnished holiday letting tax incentives to end in 2025 – Armstrong Watson, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.armstrongwatson.co.uk/news/2024/11/furnished-holiday-letting-tax-incentives-end-2025
  11. Autumn Budget 2025 – expectations and speculation regarding tax measures, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://cms-lawnow.com/en/ealerts/2025/11/autumn-budget-2025-expectations-and-speculation-regarding-tax-measures
  12. Autumn Budget 2025: Reeves confirms rumoured council tax surcharge on high value homes and reveals increase in tax on property income, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.housingtoday.co.uk/news/budget-2025-reeves-confirms-rumoured-council-tax-surcharge-on-high-value-homes-and-reveals-increase-in-tax-on-property-income/5139518.article
  13. High Value Council Tax Surcharge – GOV.UK, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/high-value-council-tax-surcharge
  14. Stamp Duty in 2025: What You Need to Know about SDLT – Black Brick Property, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.black-brick.com/property-guides/stamp-duty-in-2025-what-you-need-to-know-about-sdlt/
  15. SDLT Additional Property Surcharge 2025: Complete Policy Guide – Connaught Law, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://connaughtlaw.com/sdlt-additional-property-surcharge-guide/
  16. accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.bdo.co.uk/en-gb/insights/tax/private-client/tax-changes-for-furnished-holiday-lets#:~:text=Allowable%20Expenses%20for%20FHLs&text=From%20April%202025%2C%20you%20will,down%20allowances%20on%20that%20pool.
  17. Furnished Holiday Lettings tax regime abolished from 6 April 2025 – TaxScape | Deloitte, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://taxscape.deloitte.com/measures-spring-budget-2024/furnished-holiday-lettings-tax-regime-abolished-from-6-april-2025.aspx
  18. Economic and fiscal outlook – November 2025, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://obr.uk/efo/economic-and-fiscal-outlook-november-2025/
  19. Navigating the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 – key changes and practical implications | BCLP, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.bclplaw.com/en-US/events-insights-news/navigating-the-renters-rights-act-2025-key-changes-and-practical-implications.html
  20. Renters’ Rights Act implementation: What happens when? – The Independent Landlord, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theindependentlandlord.com/renters-rights-timetable/
  21. 5 things we learned from the Renters’ Rights Act implementation roadmap – Inside Housing, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.insidehousing.co.uk/insight/5-things-we-learned-from-the-renters-rights-act-implementation-roadmap-94780
  22. Performance Tracker 2025: Criminal justice system methodology | Institute for Government, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/performance-tracker-2025/criminal-justice/methodology
  23. accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.bytestart.co.uk/news-insights/autumn-budget-25-chancellor-hammers-small-business-owners-again/#:~:text=Main%20rate%20writing%20down%20allowance,take%20from%20many%20owner%20managers.
  24. Autumn Budget ’25 – Chancellor hammers small business owners again, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.bytestart.co.uk/news-insights/autumn-budget-25-chancellor-hammers-small-business-owners-again/
  25. Warm Homes: Local Grant policy guidance – GOV.UK, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/684fe0179d538361ad2da6eb/Warm-Homes-Local-Grant-Policy-Guidance.pdf
  26. Green Home Grants 2025: What Support is Available for Landlords?, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.mfsuk.com/blog/green-home-grants/
  27. EPC grants for landlords launched – THP Chartered Accountants, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.thp.co.uk/epc-grants-for-landlords/
  28. What grants are available to landlords to cover EPC improvement costs? – GoSimpleTax, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.gosimpletax.com/blog/what-grants-are-available-to-landlords-to-cover-epc-improvement-costs/
  29. Putting renters at the heart of the Warm Homes Plan – Energy Systems Catapult, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://es.catapult.org.uk/insight/putting-renters-at-the-heart-of-the-warm-homes-plan/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *